One of my longest standing friends from college recently
persuaded me and a group of our friends to take a dive into Frank Viola’s book
on ‘organic Christianity’ called ReimaginingChurch. Some people consider it a sequel to the book he co-authored with
George Barna, Pagan Christianity. At
my friend’s request, I read the latter book a few years ago, but only recently
read the “sequel.”
The book starts off with a very clearly projected agenda of
where individuals will probably land by its end. Either, the reader will
strongly oppose the statements made in the book about various forms of
contemporary church structure and governance, or, he/she will emerge as an
advocate of Organic Christianity. And
from what the pages of the book lay out, organic Christianity takes the form of
what would be called a ‘house church’ with governance and direction coming from
an external practitioner whose purpose is to travel from house church to house
church to correct and encourage. The
author, although he doesn’t cite Roland Allen’s Missionary Methods, I believe would find himself highly
appreciative of the work. (Side note: I first discovered Roland Allen through taking a couple classes under Graham Tomlin a few years ago.)
The book builds a case for a different form of church
practice to address multiple problems seen in the contemporary church (from
abusive leadership to passive membership). While I do empathize with the
problems the author points out and attempts to address through putting forth a
different form for church practice, I can’t help but think that any form of any
type of community (be it faith community or other) could easily fall prey to
similar problems and challenges to address.
That being said, I found that while the book made for an
interesting read, I could not find myself coming to either of the conclusive
positions that the author suggested for me as a reader at the beginning of the
book. What I believe may have been the actual purpose of the author in writing
the book was something different than a landing place in either of the two
camps outlined above, but rather a means for individuals and communities a
little more ‘traditional’ in their practice to consider house churches as a
viable alternative and within the realm of orthodoxy.
For me, I have no problem considering various forms of
gathering and leadership as legitimate. I understand that some structures
according to Viola seem to be more prone to abuse and passivity, but I can’t
help but think that this results from a lack of humility in individuals who
serve as leaders and a lack of discipline on the part of members of faith
communities. In many ways, the challenge isn’t the structure itself as much as
it is a matter of overcoming the human condition and tendency toward
selfishness, laziness, pride and more.
Viola is also unabashedly biased in his presentation of
organic Christianity. In spite of these biases, I believe that the book is born
from a place of encouraging the modern community of faith to closely examine
our lives and practices and ask hard questions about whether our practices are best serving the end of helping us to grow in our love for God and others. And, I’m extremely grateful to my friend for
encouraging me to read this book, and question my own biases as well.
2 comments:
interesting..very well written. I would agree--the church is the body--and can be found anywhere and in any number as a group of authentic worshipers..every changing as the face of need changes. i like that you mentioned the tendency toward the human nature to be selfish, lazy..etc. I love the biggest blessing of the church in my life is to easily find others to sharpen, grow, challenge and compliment the way God made me...and happy birthday old Guy--one more and you are officially OVER THE HILL...
I enjoyed your review. I think you might be reading in or seeing some things there that I don't recall but it's been a long time since I read the book in whole. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Post a Comment